AI is reaching the point where there is wild speculation, potential regulations, and opinions on if it will destroy humanity. So how does anyone make sense of all of it?

SHOW: 770

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK - http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST - "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

• Code Comments - An original podcast from Red Hat (Season 2)
• Adjusting to new technology, from teams that have been through it
• Find "Breaking Analysis Podcast with Dave Vellante" on Apple, Google and Spotify
• Keep up to data with Enterprise Tech with theCUBE

SHOW NOTES:

• OpenAI’s former top safety researcher says there’s a ’10 to 20% chance’ that the tech will take over with many or most ‘humans dead’

• The Dawn of the AI Era 2022-2023 (Acquired Podcast)
• An AI Capitalist Primer
• Techno-Optimist Manifesto (a16z)
• The AI Bill of Materials (Redmonk)
• US Gov’t Executive Offer on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI (Oct 2023)
• Regulating AI by Executive Order (Steven Sinofsky)
• The Philanthropy of Silicon Valley
• “The Trolley Problem”

ARE WE UNDER OR OVER REACTING TO THE AI POSSIBILITIES?

• Oppenheimer said the possibility of destruction was “near zero”
• OpenAI research said it’s 10-20% chance of human destruction

WHAT ARE THE OPEN, REGULATIVE AND STRUCTURAL GUARDRAILS OF AI

• What is good or bad with AI?
• Should societal concerns be considered? By whom?
• Should environmental concerns be considered? By whom?

FEEDBACK?

• Email: show at the cloudcast dot net
• Twitter: @thecloudcastnet

FEEDBACK?

• Email: show @ reasoning dot show
• Bluesky: @reasoningshow.bsky.social
• Twitter/X: @ReasoningShow
• Instagram: @reasoningshow
• TikTok: @reasoningshow